For Legal Professionals

We understand that preservation and disclosure measures are often time-critical. We can usually provide a high-level feasibility assessment within 24–48 hours, outlining whether assets appear traceable, whether they have reached regulated service providers, and whether meaningful recovery routes may exist. This helps legal teams make early strategic decisions.

Yes. We regularly produce court- and tribunal-ready forensic reports and can act as independent expert witnesses where required. Our team has experience supporting litigation involving fraud, insolvency, asset recovery and digital asset disputes, both at Recoveris and in prior roles. Our role extends beyond reporting — we combine forensic analysis with structured engagement with exchanges and service providers where appropriate.

All forensic conclusions can be scrutinised, and our approach is built with this in mind. Our reports are based on a reproducible, transparent methodology, grounded in a deep understanding of blockchain mechanics and laundering typologies. We are familiar with different tracing approaches (e.g. UTXO analysis, FIFO/LIFO and other allocation methods) and prepare reports that are technically robust while aligned with the legal strategy and jurisdictional context.

We adopt a flexible pricing approach. Fees depend on the complexity of the tracing, the scope of reporting required and the client’s budget. Where appropriate, we can structure engagements to include a success-based component, particularly where recovery actions are envisaged.

We can trace activity across all major public blockchains, including Bitcoin, Ethereum and EVM-compatible networks, as well as many other public ledgers. We use a combination of specialist analytics platforms, proprietary methods and manual forensic review to maximise coverage and attribution.

In certain cases, yes. While mixers are designed to break direct links, tracing may still be possible where users make operational errors, where inputs and outputs can be indirectly connected, or where behavioural and timing analysis supports demixing. We have successfully applied advanced withdrawal-pattern analysis to identify the most probable post-mixer flows.

No. We are forensic investigators, not a regulated legal practice, and we can support on matters with links to any jurisdiction. We support legal teams globally and tailor our work to the legal pathways available in each forum.

Standard tools provide data; we provide evidence. Our reports are structured for legal use, with executive summaries, chronological narratives, visual flow charts and evidential annexes. We translate transaction identifiers into a clear factual story that courts and tribunals can understand and rely upon.