CASE STUDY: How our investigation discovered the ZondaCrypto liquidity issues, one of Europe's largest crypto scandals. [Read the case study]

News // 05.03.2024 // 3 min read // recoveris-team

The speed asymmetry: Why manual crypto investigations are becoming obsolete

The defining metric of success in digital asset recovery is now speed. Learn how automation and AI are compressing the money laundering lifecycle into seconds, and why manual crypto investigations are becoming obsolete.

The most critical variable in digital asset recovery is no longer just geographic jurisdiction or the type of asset stolen. The defining metric of success is now speed. We are witnessing a fundamental “speed asymmetry” in the blockchain ecosystem where threat actors utilize automated scripts to compress the money laundering lifecycle into seconds, while compliance and investigation teams are often forced to rely on manual workflows. In 2025, over $4.04 billion was stolen across major hack incidents. In the fastest recorded cases, funds were moved and layered in a matter of seconds. The operational window to execute a successful freeze before funds are bridged or mixed is now estimated at just 10 to 15 minutes. (Sources: Global Ledger Hack Report 2026, TRM Labs 2026 Crypto Crime Report)

Infographic compares automated layering (fast, seamless workflow) to manual processes (slow, intermittent). Automation saves 80% of time; manual methods take 200% longer due to delays like data entry and validation.

In our experience, this automation leaves a distinct behavioral signature on the blockchain. Human investigators can easily spot when software takes the wheel.

“Usually, there are many indicators, like speed, with assets moved out just a few seconds after being received,” explains Umberto Buonora, Head of Investigations at Recoveris. “We look for schematic patterns with the same number of hops before a deposit to a service, or the use of many ‘fresh’ wallets that would take humans significant time to set up and back up.”

This programmatic execution is evolving rapidly. Threat actors are no longer just using simple mixers. They are executing complex, multi-chain evasion tactics that are designed to overwhelm traditional single-chain forensic tools.

“I would say we are seeing complex layering of stolen assets and the use of multiple blockchains to do it,” notes Dawid Koperski, Blockchain Investigations Manager at Recoveris. “There are numerous swaps between stablecoins that look very automatic and well organized. I’ve seen this specific pattern emerging strongly over the last five to six weeks.”

For investigators, tracking these cross-chain transfers creates a massive manual bottleneck. Standard blockchain analytics tools frequently hit a wall when funds move through newly deployed or unattributed cross-chain bridges. At this exact point, investigators must manually figure out which bridge was used and then trace the corresponding withdrawals on the destination chain. Furthermore, synthesizing this raw, multi-chain data into a court-admissible forensic report requires extensive manual labor, triple-checking of data, and continuous monitoring of new wallet activity.

As generative AI makes it easier for criminals to find vulnerabilities in platforms and deploy better drainer contracts, the volume and velocity of these attacks will only increase. To counter this, the industry requires an entirely new operational standard.

Infographic titled On-Chain Behavioral Signatures shows an originating wallet connected to four types of wallets, each with unique behaviors, for analyzing blockchain transactions and compliance. Key insights and risks are listed below.

“In our work, timing is crucial,” Dawid Koperski emphasizes. “Fraudsters are getting quicker and smarter thanks to AI, and we are most of the time banging at the door while they’re lurking by the window, hoping we will go away. To counter that, it would be highly beneficial to have better cooperation between VASPs and good actors like Recoveris.”

This is exactly why manual crypto investigations are becoming obsolete and why we are building the Blockchain Investigations Management System (BIMS). By automating the cross-chain correlation of unattributed bridge transfers and standardizing the drafting of forensic reports, BIMS removes the most time-consuming manual tasks from the investigator’s desk. Coupled with our strict 24-hour Incident Response program, Recoveris provides Virtual Asset Service Providers and legal professionals with the rapid, AI-enhanced intelligence required to break down the door before the perpetrators can escape.

Infographic showing cross-chain evasion versus AI systems in blockchain. A magnifying glass highlights AI correlation detecting patterns and anomalies between source and destination blockchains, simplifying insights for secure digital asset flows.

Read more

Crypto theft: why incident response must be ready before an attack
20.10.2026

Crypto theft: why incident response must be ready before an attack

Hardware wallet incidents, data leaks and UK crypto robberies show why crypto incident response must be ready before theft occurs.

Does MiCA help recover stolen crypto? What EU victims and advisers need to know
05.10.2026

Does MiCA help recover stolen crypto? What EU victims and advisers need to know

Does MiCA help recover stolen crypto in the EU? Learn what provider rules cover, what they cannot reverse, and which steps still matter.

Recoveris Monthly – September 2026
30.09.2026

Recoveris Monthly – September 2026

The civil route in crypto cases, September’s investigation lessons, CoTrace, our NCA/FCA workshop and October events.